If Brandon Nimmo departs in free agency, the New York Mets will have a significant gap to fill in their lineup. Nimmo has been a consistent leadoff hitter, a solid defender in center field, and a steady presence in the Mets’ offense. Replacing him, therefore, won’t be easy, but the Mets have options both internally and externally. Below are three potential replacements for Nimmo if he leaves, taking into account different avenues: free agency, trade, and internal options.
### 1. **Kevin Kiermaier (Free Agency)**
One of the most logical external replacements for Brandon Nimmo could be veteran center fielder Kevin Kiermaier. The 33-year-old former Tampa Bay Ray is known for his elite defense, particularly his ability to track down balls in the outfield, a skill that would be essential in the Mets’ spacious ballpark. Although his bat has never been as dynamic as Nimmo’s, Kiermaier is still an above-average offensive player when healthy and would provide excellent value as a defender.
**Why Kiermaier Makes Sense:**
– **Elite Defense:** Kiermaier is regarded as one of the best defensive center fielders in baseball. His glove and ability to cover ground would help mitigate the loss of Nimmo’s defense. While Nimmo has been solid in center, Kiermaier has consistently been regarded as one of the top defensive outfielders in the game.
– **Leadoff Potential:** Although not as effective as Nimmo in getting on base, Kiermaier still possesses the ability to work counts, draw walks, and steal bases. His on-base percentage (.310 in 2023) may not be quite Nimmo’s (.367), but his speed and base-stealing ability would still provide significant value in the leadoff spot.
– **Veteran Leadership:** The Mets would benefit from Kiermaier’s experience and leadership, especially if the team continues to develop younger players. His experience in the postseason with Tampa Bay could also be invaluable for a Mets team that aims for a deep playoff run.
– **Short-Term Solution:** If the Mets are looking for a stopgap or bridge solution before committing long-term to a center fielder, Kiermaier could fill that role well. His defensive skills would allow the Mets to remain competitive while they explore more long-term options down the line.
**Potential Drawbacks:**
Kiermaier has struggled with injuries in recent years, and his bat can be streaky. If he is asked to take over the leadoff spot on a daily basis, his offensive inconsistency might be a concern. Additionally, his offensive upside isn’t as high as Nimmo’s, so the Mets may need to make up for that in other areas of their lineup.
—
### 2. **Brandon Marsh (Trade)**
If the Mets want to pursue a younger, potentially higher-upside option, trading for Brandon Marsh of the Philadelphia Phillies could be a smart move. Marsh is a 25-year-old center fielder who has shown flashes of brilliance both offensively and defensively. After a trade to the Phillies in 2022, he continued to develop into an above-average contributor, and his overall skill set makes him an intriguing option.
**Why Brandon Marsh Makes Sense:**
– **Youth and Upside:** At just 25 years old, Marsh has significant room for growth, both offensively and defensively. His defense is already strong, and with a bit more refinement at the plate, he could evolve into a player with a skill set similar to Nimmo’s, providing value with both his glove and bat.
– **Good Contact Skills:** Marsh’s batting profile leans more toward contact than power. He doesn’t possess the same power as Nimmo, but he could potentially develop into a solid leadoff hitter given his excellent bat-to-ball skills. His .292 batting average in 2023 shows he has the ability to hit for average, and he’s also shown an ability to get on base at a respectable clip.
– **Defense and Athleticism:** Marsh is an excellent defender in center field with elite range and the ability to make difficult plays look routine. His athleticism would allow the Mets to continue to have a reliable center fielder with the ability to cover a lot of ground.
– **Controlled for Several Years:** Marsh is still in his pre-arbitration years, meaning he’s under team control for the next few seasons. This would be a cost-effective way for the Mets to secure an impactful center fielder without breaking the bank, especially if they decide to allocate resources to other areas of the roster.
**Potential Drawbacks:**
Marsh still has room to grow as a hitter, particularly in terms of plate discipline. His walk rate was modest, and he strikes out quite a bit. If the Mets are looking for an immediate offensive upgrade in the leadoff spot, Marsh might not be the ideal choice right away. However, his potential for improvement could make him a great long-term option.
—
### 3. **Mark Vientos (Internal Option)**
If the Mets choose to go with an internal solution, Mark Vientos is one name that could be considered. Vientos is a top prospect who has shown strong power potential but has yet to fully establish himself in the majors. Although he’s primarily known for his bat and has played third base and first base, Vientos also has some experience in the outfield, and the Mets could consider giving him a shot in the outfield, including center field.
**Why Mark Vientos Makes Sense:**
– **Power Potential:** Vientos has one of the most powerful bats in the Mets’ system. His raw power is his standout tool, and while he’s been mostly used as a corner infielder, there’s a chance that the Mets could get creative and give him a shot in the outfield. His ability to hit for power would add some much-needed thump to a lineup that could lose Nimmo’s on-base skills and consistency.
– **Cost-Effective:** If the Mets are looking for a low-cost solution, Vientos is already on the roster and doesn’t require a trade or new free-agent contract. Giving him a shot at a regular role could save the Mets money while allowing them to develop their young talent.
– **Flexibility in the Lineup:** While Vientos may not be able to replace Nimmo’s elite defense in center field, his bat could provide a unique dimension to the Mets’ lineup. Additionally, his positional flexibility (if he’s able to adapt to the outfield) could allow the Mets to make other moves to balance the roster.
**Potential Drawbacks:**
Vientos is still relatively unproven at the major league level, and there would be significant risk in moving him to a more challenging position like center field. Additionally, while his power potential is high, his contact skills and ability to get on base are still works in progress. There’s also the question of whether he could replicate the consistency that Nimmo brought to the table.
—
### Conclusion
Brandon Nimmo’s potential departure leaves the Mets with some difficult choices. Kevin Kiermaier could provide immediate defensive value, though he’s not the long-term answer. Brandon Marsh offers more upside and youth, though there are still questions about his offensive consistency. Mark Vientos could be a wildcard, offering a cost-effective solution with plenty of power potential, but his ability to handle center field is uncertain.
Ultimately, the Mets will need to evaluate their overall roster needs, balancing both short-term and long-term goals when making a decision. Whether they opt for an experienced veteran like Kiermaier or a younger player like Marsh or Vientos, the key will be ensuring that the replacement brings a well-rounded skill set to keep the Mets competitive.